CPU
GPU
Celeron G3900E
Xeon E5410
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G3900E is positioned at rank 816 and the Xeon E5410 is on rank 918, so the Celeron G3900E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900E
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5410
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G3900E | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($35) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G3900E | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+75%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($35) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G3900E and Xeon E5410
Celeron G3900E
The Celeron G3900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,034 points. Launch price was $107.
Xeon E5410
The Xeon E5410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,032 points. Launch price was $256.
Processing Power
The Celeron G3900E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5410 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5410 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G3900E versus 0.33 GHz on the Xeon E5410 — a 151.6% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900E. The Celeron G3900E uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5410 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900E scores 2,034 against the Xeon E5410's 2,032 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G3900E. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3900E vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5410.
| Feature | Celeron G3900E | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+627% | 0.33 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 2.33 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB L2 Cache+500% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 6 MB (total)+1100% |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Harpertown (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,034 | 2,032 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 699 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 948 | — |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900E versus DDR2-667 on the Xeon E5410 — the Celeron G3900E supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3900E) vs 0 (Xeon E5410) — the Celeron G3900E offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Celeron G3900E | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | — | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133+100% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron G3900E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Xeon E5410 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900E targets Budget, Xeon E5410 targets Server. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900E rivals Pentium G4400.
| Feature | Celeron G3900E | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 510 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Server |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G3900E launched at $107 MSRP, while the Xeon E5410 debuted at $256. At current prices ($35 vs $20), the Xeon E5410 is $15 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3900E delivers 58.1 pts/$ vs 101.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5410 — making the Xeon E5410 the 54.5% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G3900E | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107-58% | $256 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35 | $20-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.1 | 101.6+75% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron G3900E and Xeon E5410
