Celeron G3900E vs Celeron N4505

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3900E vs Celeron N4505 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3900E vs Celeron N4505: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3900E

2016

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 510, while Celeron N4505 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,034 vs 2,037).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Celeron N4505 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌250% higher power demand at 35W vs 10W.

Celeron N4505

2021

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 10W instead of 35W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4505 better than Celeron G3900E?

Yes. Celeron N4505 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N4505 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4505 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N4505 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N4505 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G3900E only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2016 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (19.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on that older DDR4-era platform.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4505 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016), 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3900E vs Celeron N4505 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3900E

The Celeron G3900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,034 points. Launch price was $107.

Celeron N4505

The Celeron N4505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,037 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3900E and Celeron N4505 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G3900E versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N4505 — a 18.9% clock advantage for the Celeron N4505. The Celeron G3900E uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron N4505 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900E scores 2,034 against the Celeron N4505's 2,037 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron N4505. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3900E vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N4505.

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Celeron N4505
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.9 GHz+21%
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	1.5 MB (total)+200%
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark	2,034	2,037
Geekbench 6 Single	699	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	948	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3900E) / not specified (Celeron N4505). The Celeron G3900E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Celeron N4505 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900E rivals Pentium G4400.