Celeron G3900E vs Pentium P6000

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3900E vs Pentium P6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3900E vs Pentium P6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3900E

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $43 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 39.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.0 vs 13.7 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 510, while Pentium P6000 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,034 vs 2,051).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Pentium P6000

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 19.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3900E better than Pentium P6000?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G3900E is ahead with a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium P6000 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Pentium P6000 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium P6000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3900E is the better buy right now. Celeron G3900E comes in $43 cheaper on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Pentium P6000 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 39.0% better value on MSRP (19.0 vs 13.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3900E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3900E vs Pentium P6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3900E

The Celeron G3900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,034 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium P6000

The Pentium P6000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.88 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3900E and Pentium P6000 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G3900E versus 1.88 GHz on the Pentium P6000 — a 24.3% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900E. The Celeron G3900E uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium P6000 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900E scores 2,034 against the Pentium P6000's 2,051 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium P6000. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3900E vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6000.

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Pentium P6000
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+28%	1.88 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.86 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,034	2,051
Geekbench 6 Single	699	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	948	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3900E) / not specified (Pentium P6000). The Celeron G3900E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Pentium P6000 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900E rivals Pentium G4400.

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Pentium P6000
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 510	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3900E was priced at $107, while the Pentium P6000 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($107 vs $150), Celeron G3900E was $43 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3900E delivers 19.0 pts/$ vs 13.7 pts/$ for the Pentium P6000 — making the Celeron G3900E the 32.7% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Pentium P6000
MSRP	$107-29%	$150
Performance per Dollar	19.0+39%	13.7
Release Date	2016	2010

Search Celeron G3900E on Amazon

Search Pentium P6000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.