Celeron G3900E vs Turion II P520

Celeron G3900E vs Turion II P520 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G3900E

2 / 2

2,034

0.0%

2,047

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3900E vs Turion II P520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3900E vs Turion II P520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3900E

2016

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 510, while Turion II P520 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,034 vs 2,047).
❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Turion II P520 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Turion II P520

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3900E better than Turion II P520?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G3900E is ahead with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion II P520 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II P520 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3900E is the better buy right now. Celeron G3900E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $107 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Turion II P520 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3900E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3900E vs Turion II P520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3900E

The Celeron G3900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,034 points. Launch price was $107.

Turion II P520

The Turion II P520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,047 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3900E and Turion II P520 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G3900E versus 2.3 GHz on the Turion II P520 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900E. The Celeron G3900E uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Turion II P520 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900E scores 2,034 against the Turion II P520's 2,047 — a 0.6% lead for the Turion II P520.

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Turion II P520
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+4%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB+300%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,034	2,047
Geekbench 6 Single	699	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	948	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3900E) / not specified (Turion II P520). The Celeron G3900E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Turion II P520 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900E rivals Pentium G4400.