Pentium G4520 vs Xeon E5607

Intel

Pentium G4520

2 Cores2 Thrd51 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5607

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 0.27 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Pentium G4520 vs Xeon E5607 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium G4520 vs Xeon E5607 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium G4520 vs Xeon E5607: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium G4520

2015

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $49 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
  • Delivers 56.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
  • Draws 51W instead of 80W, a 29W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,670 vs 2,686).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5607, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon E5607

2011

Why buy it

  • +0.6% higher PassMark.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium G4520 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.9 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($135 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
  • 56.9% higher power demand at 80W vs 51W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G4520 better than Xeon E5607?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5607 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium G4520 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5607 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium G4520 is the better buy right now. Pentium G4520 comes in $49 cheaper on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $135 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5607 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 56.0% better value on MSRP (31.0 vs 19.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium G4520 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium G4520 vs Xeon E5607 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Pentium G4520

The Pentium G4520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,670 points. Launch price was $93.

Intel

Xeon E5607

The Xeon E5607 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,686 points. Launch price was $135.

Processing Power

The Pentium G4520 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5607 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5607 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Pentium G4520 versus 0.27 GHz on the Xeon E5607 — a 172.1% clock advantage for the Pentium G4520 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Pentium G4520 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5607 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G4520 scores 2,670 against the Xeon E5607's 2,686 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5607. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Pentium G4520 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E5607.

FeaturePentium G4520Xeon E5607
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+1233%
0.27 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+59%
2.26 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
2,670
2,686
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G4520 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5607 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium G4520Xeon E5607
Socket
LGA1151
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Pentium G4520 was priced at $86, while the Xeon E5607 came in at $135. On launch pricing ($86 vs $135), Pentium G4520 was $49 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium G4520 delivers 31.0 pts/$ vs 19.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5607 — making the Pentium G4520 the 43.8% better value option.

FeaturePentium G4520Xeon E5607
MSRP
$86-36%
$135
Performance per Dollar
31.0+56%
19.9
Release Date
2015
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.