Core m3-7Y32 vs Pentium G4520

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core m3-7Y32 vs Pentium G4520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core m3-7Y32 vs Pentium G4520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core m3-7Y32

2017

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 5W instead of 51W, a 47W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium G4520 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).

Pentium G4520

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $195 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 223.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 9.6 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,670 vs 2,697).
❌1033.3% higher power demand at 51W vs 4.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core m3-7Y32 better than Pentium G4520?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G4520 is ahead with a 7.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-7Y32 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-7Y32 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m3-7Y32 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core m3-7Y32 comes in 226.7% more expensive on MSRP at $281 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. Pentium G4520 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 223.5% better value on paper (31.0 vs 9.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m3-7Y32 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core m3-7Y32 vs Pentium G4520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core m3-7Y32

The Core m3-7Y32 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,697 points. Launch price was $281.

Pentium G4520

The Pentium G4520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,670 points. Launch price was $93.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core m3-7Y32 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G4520's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core m3-7Y32 versus 3.6 GHz on the Pentium G4520 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Pentium G4520 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core m3-7Y32 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G4520 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-7Y32 scores 2,697 against the Pentium G4520's 2,670 — a 1% lead for the Core m3-7Y32. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core m3-7Y32 vs 4 MB (total) on the Pentium G4520.

Feature	Core m3-7Y32	Pentium G4520
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.6 GHz+20%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3.6 GHz+227%
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,697+1%	2,670

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m3-7Y32 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G4520 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core m3-7Y32	Pentium G4520
Socket	FCBGA1515	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core m3-7Y32 was priced at $281, while the Pentium G4520 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($281 vs $86), Pentium G4520 was $195 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m3-7Y32 delivers 9.6 pts/$ vs 31.0 pts/$ for the Pentium G4520 — making the Pentium G4520 the 105.5% better value option.

Feature	Core m3-7Y32	Pentium G4520
MSRP	$281	$86-69%
Performance per Dollar	9.6	31.0+223%
Release Date	2017	2015

Search Core m3-7Y32 on Amazon

Search Pentium G4520 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.