Core m3-7Y32 vs Opteron 3350 HE

Intel

Core m3-7Y32

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 3 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Opteron 3350 HE

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Core m3-7Y32 vs Opteron 3350 HE Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core m3-7Y32 vs Opteron 3350 HE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core m3-7Y32 vs Opteron 3350 HE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core m3-7Y32

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 5W instead of 45W, a 41W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,697 vs 2,699).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 3350 HE, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Opteron 3350 HE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Opteron 3350 HE

2012

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

  • 900% higher power demand at 45W vs 4.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 3350 HE better than Core m3-7Y32?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 3350 HE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core m3-7Y32 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Opteron 3350 HE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.7% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 3350 HE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Opteron 3350 HE is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Opteron 3350 HE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core m3-7Y32 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 2.7% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core m3-7Y32 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core m3-7Y32 vs Opteron 3350 HE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core m3-7Y32

The Core m3-7Y32 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,697 points. Launch price was $281.

AMD

Opteron 3350 HE

The Opteron 3350 HE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,699 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core m3-7Y32 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 3350 HE offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 3350 HE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core m3-7Y32 versus 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 3350 HE — a 23.5% clock advantage for the Opteron 3350 HE (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core m3-7Y32 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 3350 HE uses Delhi (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-7Y32 scores 2,697 against the Opteron 3350 HE's 2,699 — a 0.1% lead for the Opteron 3350 HE. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core m3-7Y32 vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3350 HE.

FeatureCore m3-7Y32Opteron 3350 HE
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.8 GHz+27%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
2.8 GHz+155%
L3 Cache
4 MB
8192 kB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB
4096 kB+700%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Delhi (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,697
2,699
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m3-7Y32 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 3350 HE uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore m3-7Y32Opteron 3350 HE
Socket
FCBGA1515
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0