Core m3-7Y32 vs FX-4130
Core m3-7Y32
FX-4130
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m3-7Y32 is positioned at rank 1090 and the FX-4130 is on rank 637, so the FX-4130 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core m3-7Y32
Performance Per Dollar FX-4130
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core m3-7Y32 | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core m3-7Y32 | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1033%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core m3-7Y32 and FX-4130
Core m3-7Y32
The Core m3-7Y32 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,697 points. Launch price was $281.
FX-4130
The FX-4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 August 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,718 points. Launch price was $112.
Processing Power
The Core m3-7Y32 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4130 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4130 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core m3-7Y32 versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-4130 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the FX-4130 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core m3-7Y32 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-4130 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-7Y32 scores 2,697 against the FX-4130's 2,718 — a 0.8% lead for the FX-4130.
| Feature | Core m3-7Y32 | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.9 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz+245% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 4096 kB+700% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 2,697 | 2,718 |
Memory & Platform
The Core m3-7Y32 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4130 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core m3-7Y32 | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core m3-7Y32 launched at $281 MSRP, while the FX-4130 debuted at $100. At current prices ($281 vs $25), the FX-4130 is $256 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m3-7Y32 delivers 9.6 pts/$ vs 108.7 pts/$ for the FX-4130 — making the FX-4130 the 167.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core m3-7Y32 | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281 | $100-64% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $281 | $25-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6 | 108.7+1032% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core m3-7Y32 and FX-4130
