Pentium G620 vs Xeon 5140

Intel

Pentium G620

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon 5140

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.33 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······

Pentium G620 vs Xeon 5140 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium G620 vs Xeon 5140 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium G620 vs Xeon 5140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium G620

2011

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Launch MSRP is still $64 MSRP, while Xeon 5140 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Xeon 5140

    2006

    Why buy it

      Trade-offs

      • Lower PassMark (1,235 vs 1,238).

      Quick Answers

      So, is Pentium G620 better than Xeon 5140?
      Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 5140 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium G620 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
      Which one is better for gaming?
      If gaming is the priority, Pentium G620 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
      Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
      For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G620 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
      Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
      Pentium G620 is the better buy right now. Pentium G620 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $64 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
      Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
      Pentium G620 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

      Pentium G620 vs Xeon 5140 Technical Specifications

      Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

      Intel

      Pentium G620

      The Pentium G620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,238 points. Launch price was $60.

      Intel

      Xeon 5140

      The Xeon 5140 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,235 points. Launch price was $15.

      Processing Power

      Both the Pentium G620 and Xeon 5140 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Pentium G620 versus 2.33 GHz on the Xeon 5140 — a 11% clock advantage for the Pentium G620 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.33 GHz). The Pentium G620 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon 5140 uses Woodcrest (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G620 scores 1,238 against the Xeon 5140's 1,235 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium G620. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G620 vs 0 kB on the Xeon 5140.

      FeaturePentium G620Xeon 5140
      Cores / Threads
      2 / 2
      2 / 2
      Boost Clock
      2.6 GHz+12%
      2.33 GHz
      Base Clock
      2.6 GHz+12%
      2.33 GHz
      L3 Cache
      3 MB (total)
      0 kB
      L2 Cache
      256 kB (per core)
      4 MB+1500%
      Process
      32 nm-51%
      65 nm
      Architecture
      Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
      Woodcrest (2006)
      PassMark
      1,238
      1,235
      🧠

      Memory & Platform

      The Pentium G620 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon 5140 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

      FeaturePentium G620Xeon 5140
      Socket
      LGA1155
      LGA771
      PCIe Generation
      PCIe 2.0
      PCIe 2.0