Athlon 64 TF-20
VS
Pentium G620

Athlon 64 TF-20 vs Pentium G620

AMD

Athlon 64 TF-20

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Pentium G620

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 TF-20 is positioned at rank 790 and the Pentium G620 is on rank 807, so the Athlon 64 TF-20 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 TF-20

#778
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1178%
#779
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1161%
#780
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1066%
#781
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1061%
#782
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1051%
#784
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1015%
#785
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
973%
#786
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
972%
#787
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
946%
#790
Athlon 64 TF-20
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#795
Core i3-1115G4E
MSRP: $213|Avg: $47
99%
#797
Celeron M 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
#800
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#801
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
98%
#803
Core i7-1365UE
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
97%
#805
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G620

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16118%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15230%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11058%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3331%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2639%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2308%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1322%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1305%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1188%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1188%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1175%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1143%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1127%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1122%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1112%
#807
Pentium G620
MSRP: $64|Avg: $12
100%
#808
Pentium G645T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
100%
#809
Core i5-7442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
100%
#812
Core i3-3250T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
99%
#813
Core i5-5575R
MSRP: $265|Avg: $50
99%
#815
Core i3-3210
MSRP: $117|Avg: $25
99%
#816
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
98%
#817
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
98%
#818
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
98%
#819
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
97%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
96%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
96%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium G620 leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon 64 TF-20 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon 64 TF-20Pentium G620
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($12)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sherman (2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Athlon 64 TF-20 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 17% cheaper ($10 vs $12) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightAthlon 64 TF-20Pentium G620
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+21%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($12)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 TF-20 and Pentium G620

AMD

Athlon 64 TF-20

The Athlon 64 TF-20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Sherman (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,245 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Pentium G620

The Pentium G620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,238 points. Launch price was $60.

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 TF-20 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium G620 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium G620 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 TF-20 versus 2.6 GHz on the Pentium G620 — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Pentium G620. The Athlon 64 TF-20 uses the Sherman (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium G620 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 TF-20 scores 1,245 against the Pentium G620's 1,238 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon 64 TF-20.

FeatureAthlon 64 TF-20Pentium G620
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
2.6 GHz+63%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Sherman (2009)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,245
1,238
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 TF-20 uses the S1g1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G620 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 TF-20Pentium G620
Socket
S1g1
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Athlon 64 TF-20) / not specified (Pentium G620).

FeatureAthlon 64 TF-20Pentium G620
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false
💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon 64 TF-20 launched at $50 MSRP, while the Pentium G620 debuted at $64. At current prices ($10 vs $12), the Athlon 64 TF-20 is $2 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 TF-20 delivers 124.5 pts/$ vs 103.2 pts/$ for the Pentium G620 — making the Athlon 64 TF-20 the 18.7% better value option.

FeatureAthlon 64 TF-20Pentium G620
MSRP
$50-22%
$64
Avg Price (30d)
$10-17%
$12
Performance per Dollar
124.5+21%
103.2
Release Date
2009
2011