Athlon 64 TF-20
VS
Pentium G6950

Athlon 64 TF-20 vs Pentium G6950

AMD

Athlon 64 TF-20

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Pentium G6950

2 Cores2 Thrd73 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 TF-20 is positioned at rank 790 and the Pentium G6950 is on rank 909, so the Athlon 64 TF-20 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 TF-20

#778
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1178%
#779
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1161%
#780
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1066%
#781
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1061%
#782
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1051%
#784
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1015%
#785
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
973%
#786
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
972%
#787
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
946%
#790
Athlon 64 TF-20
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#795
Core i3-1115G4E
MSRP: $213|Avg: $47
99%
#797
Celeron M 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
#800
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#801
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
98%
#803
Core i7-1365UE
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
97%
#805
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G6950

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21662%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
20468%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
14862%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4477%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3546%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3102%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1777%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1754%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1597%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1597%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1579%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1536%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1515%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1509%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1495%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
97%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
100%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#911
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
100%
#912
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
99%
#913
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
99%
#914
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
99%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#916
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
98%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
98%
#919
Core i7-4930K
MSRP: $670|Avg: $100
97%
#920
Sempron LE-1250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
97%
#921
Pentium E6500
MSRP: $84|Avg: $10
97%
#922
Core i5-2500
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
97%
#923
Athlon II X4 605e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $25
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium G6950 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Athlon 64 TF-20 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon 64 TF-20Pentium G6950
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sherman (2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Athlon 64 TF-20 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $10 (vs $25), it costs 60% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 149% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Pentium G6950.
InsightAthlon 64 TF-20Pentium G6950
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+149%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 TF-20 and Pentium G6950

AMD

Athlon 64 TF-20

The Athlon 64 TF-20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Sherman (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,245 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Pentium G6950

The Pentium G6950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,252 points. Launch price was $60.

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 TF-20 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium G6950 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium G6950 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 TF-20 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G6950 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Pentium G6950. The Athlon 64 TF-20 uses the Sherman (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium G6950 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 TF-20 scores 1,245 against the Pentium G6950's 1,252 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium G6950.

FeatureAthlon 64 TF-20Pentium G6950
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+75%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Sherman (2009)
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,245
1,252
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 TF-20 uses the S1g1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G6950 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 TF-20Pentium G6950
Socket
S1g1
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Athlon 64 TF-20) / not specified (Pentium G6950).

FeatureAthlon 64 TF-20Pentium G6950
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false
💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon 64 TF-20 launched at $50 MSRP, while the Pentium G6950 debuted at $87. At current prices ($10 vs $25), the Athlon 64 TF-20 is $15 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 TF-20 delivers 124.5 pts/$ vs 50.1 pts/$ for the Pentium G6950 — making the Athlon 64 TF-20 the 85.3% better value option.

FeatureAthlon 64 TF-20Pentium G6950
MSRP
$50-43%
$87
Avg Price (30d)
$10-60%
$25
Performance per Dollar
124.5+149%
50.1
Release Date
2009
2010