Athlon 64 TF-20 vs Turion II Neo K625

Athlon 64 TF-20 vs Turion II Neo K625 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 TF-20

1 / 1

1,245

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion II Neo K625

2 / 2

1,241

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 TF-20 vs Turion II Neo K625 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 TF-20 vs Turion II Neo K625: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 TF-20

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Turion II Neo K625 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Turion II Neo K625

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,241 vs 1,245).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 TF-20 better than Turion II Neo K625?

Yes. Athlon 64 TF-20 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 TF-20 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 TF-20 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 TF-20 is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 TF-20 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $50 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (24.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion II Neo K625 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 TF-20 vs Turion II Neo K625 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 TF-20

The Athlon 64 TF-20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Sherman (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,245 points. Launch price was $149.

Turion II Neo K625

The Turion II Neo K625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,241 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 TF-20 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Turion II Neo K625 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Turion II Neo K625 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 TF-20 versus 1.5 GHz on the Turion II Neo K625 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 TF-20. The Athlon 64 TF-20 uses the Sherman (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion II Neo K625 uses Geneva (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 TF-20 scores 1,245 against the Turion II Neo K625's 1,241 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon 64 TF-20.

Feature	Athlon 64 TF-20	Turion II Neo K625
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz+7%	1.5 GHz
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Sherman (2009)	Geneva (2010)
PassMark	1,245	1,241

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 TF-20 uses the S1g1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion II Neo K625 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.