
Pentium G620T

Pentium G3258
Pentium G620T vs Pentium G3258 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Pentium G620T vs Pentium G3258 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Warzone

Civilization VI
Pentium G620T vs Pentium G3258: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Pentium G620T
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.1 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium G3258 across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,055 vs 2,063).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G3258 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Pentium G3258
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics, while Pentium G620T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 32.1 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
- ❌54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G3258 better than Pentium G620T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium G620T vs Pentium G3258 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium G620T
The Pentium G620T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,055 points. Launch price was $80.

Pentium G3258
The Pentium G3258 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,063 points. Launch price was $77.
Processing Power
Both the Pentium G620T and Pentium G3258 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Pentium G620T versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium G3258 — a 37% clock advantage for the Pentium G3258 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Pentium G620T uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G3258 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G620T scores 2,055 against the Pentium G3258's 2,063 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium G3258. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Pentium G620T | Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz+45% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 2,055 | 2,063 |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium G620T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G3258 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Pentium G620T | Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Pentium G620T) / VT-x (Pentium G3258). The Pentium G3258 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Pentium G620T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G3258 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Pentium G620T | Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Pentium G620T was priced at $64, while the Pentium G3258 came in at $75. On launch pricing ($64 vs $75), Pentium G620T was $11 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium G620T delivers 32.1 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Pentium G3258 — making the Pentium G620T the 15.4% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium G620T | Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $64-15% | $75 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.1+17% | 27.5 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














