
A8-3800

Pentium G620T
A8-3800 vs Pentium G620T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A8-3800 vs Pentium G620T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A8-3800 vs Pentium G620T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A8-3800
2011Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6550D, while Pentium G620T needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Pentium G620T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,051 vs 2,055).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 32.1 PassMark/$ ($130 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Pentium G620T
2011Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $66 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 103.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.1 vs 15.8 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A8-3800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-3800.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G620T better than A8-3800?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A8-3800 vs Pentium G620T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-3800
The A8-3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $90.

Pentium G620T
The Pentium G620T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,055 points. Launch price was $80.
Processing Power
The A8-3800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G620T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-3800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A8-3800 versus 2.2 GHz on the Pentium G620T — a 20.4% clock advantage for the A8-3800 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The A8-3800 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G620T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3800 scores 2,051 against the Pentium G620T's 2,055 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium G620T. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3800 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G620T.
| Feature | A8-3800 | Pentium G620T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz+23% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+9% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,051 | 2,055 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 370 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,350 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A8-3800 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G620T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | A8-3800 | Pentium G620T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM1 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-3800) / not specified (Pentium G620T). The A8-3800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6550D), while the Pentium G620T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3800 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-3800 rivals Core i3-2100.
| Feature | A8-3800 | Pentium G620T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6550D | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A8-3800 was priced at $130, while the Pentium G620T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($130 vs $64), Pentium G620T was $66 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-3800 delivers 15.8 pts/$ vs 32.1 pts/$ for the Pentium G620T — making the Pentium G620T the 68.2% better value option.
| Feature | A8-3800 | Pentium G620T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $130 | $64-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.8 | 32.1+103% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















