
A8-3800 vs Core i3-2130

A8-3800

Core i3-2130
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-3800 is positioned at rank 886 and the Core i3-2130 is on rank 899, so the A8-3800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A8-3800
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2130
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A8-3800 | Core i3-2130 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($138) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A8-3800 | Core i3-2130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+242%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($138) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A8-3800 and Core i3-2130

A8-3800
The A8-3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i3-2130
The Core i3-2130 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,067 points. Launch price was $123.
Processing Power
The A8-3800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-2130 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A8-3800 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-2130 — a 23% clock advantage for the Core i3-2130 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The A8-3800 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-2130 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3800 scores 2,051 against the Core i3-2130's 2,067 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-2130. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 370 vs 505, a 30.9% lead for the Core i3-2130 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3800 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2130.
| Feature | A8-3800 | Core i3-2130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz+42% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,051 | 2,067 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 370 | 505+36% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,350 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A8-3800 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-2130 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1866 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A8-3800) and H61,B65,H67,P67,Z68,Q67,Q75,H77,Z75,Z77 (Core i3-2130).
| Feature | A8-3800 | Core i3-2130 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM1 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-3800) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2130). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6550D (A8-3800) and HD Graphics 2000 (Core i3-2130) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3800 targets Budget Desktop, Core i3-2130 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-3800 rivals Core i3-2100; Core i3-2130 rivals Pentium G860.
| Feature | A8-3800 | Core i3-2130 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6550D | HD Graphics 2000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | Mainstream Desktop |
Value Analysis
The A8-3800 launched at $130 MSRP, while the Core i3-2130 debuted at $138. At current prices ($40 vs $138), the A8-3800 is $98 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-3800 delivers 51.3 pts/$ vs 15.0 pts/$ for the Core i3-2130 — making the A8-3800 the 109.6% better value option.
| Feature | A8-3800 | Core i3-2130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $130-6% | $138 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-71% | $138 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.3+242% | 15.0 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















