A8-3800
VS
Xeon E7-8890 v4

A8-3800 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4

AMD

A8-3800

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Xeon E7-8890 v4

24 Cores48 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-3800 is positioned at rank 886 and the Xeon E7-8890 v4 is on rank 864, so the Xeon E7-8890 v4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-3800

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
19754%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
18665%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
13553%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4083%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3234%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2829%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1620%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1599%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1456%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1456%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1440%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1401%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1381%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1376%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1363%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
94%
#886
A8-3800
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
100%
#887
Pentium E5200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
99%
#888
Athlon II X2 235e
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
99%
#889
Athlon II X2 250e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $15
99%
#890
Core i7-2600S
MSRP: $297|Avg: $99
99%
#891
Athlon II X2 250u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
99%
#892
Core i3-2125
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
98%
#893
Pentium G6951
MSRP: $89|Avg: $50
98%
#895
Celeron G1820
MSRP: $110|Avg: $15
98%
#896
Celeron E1600
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
97%
#897
Athlon II X2 270u
MSRP: $68|Avg: $10
97%
#898
Core i5-4570TE
MSRP: $202|Avg: $40
97%
#899
Core i3-2130
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E7-8890 v4

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
20236%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3821%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3395%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2622%
#485
Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP: $3950|Avg: $1400
100%
#486
EPYC 9175F
MSRP: $4256|Avg: $3703
100%
#488
EPYC 9534
MSRP: $8803|Avg: $2999
99%
#489
EPYC 9654
MSRP: $11805|Avg: $5345
98%
#490
EPYC 7H12
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $1340
98%
#491
EPYC 7742
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $800
97%
#492
Xeon Platinum 8352M
MSRP: $4471|Avg: $4471
97%
#493
Xeon Platinum 8570
MSRP: $9595|Avg: $9595
95%
#864
Xeon E7-8890 v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#871
Xeon 6315P
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $160
98%
#877
Xeon X5687
MSRP: $552|Avg: $189
95%
#878
Xeon E5-2630 v4
MSRP: $1171|Avg: $130
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E7-8890 v4 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightA8-3800Xeon E7-8890 v4
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A8-3800 ($40), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($40 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightA8-3800Xeon E7-8890 v4
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-3800 and Xeon E7-8890 v4

AMD

A8-3800

The A8-3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Xeon E7-8890 v4

The Xeon E7-8890 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,054 points. Launch price was $7,174.

Processing Power

The A8-3800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon E7-8890 v4 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A8-3800 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-8890 v4 — a 23% clock advantage for the Xeon E7-8890 v4 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The A8-3800 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3800 scores 2,051 against the Xeon E7-8890 v4's 2,054 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E7-8890 v4. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3800 vs 60 MB on the Xeon E7-8890 v4.

FeatureA8-3800Xeon E7-8890 v4
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
24 / 48+500%
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
3.4 GHz+26%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+9%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
60 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
6 MB+500%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
2,051
2,054
Geekbench 6 Single
370
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,350
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3800 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA8-3800Xeon E7-8890 v4
Socket
FM1
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-3800) / not specified (Xeon E7-8890 v4). The A8-3800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6550D), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3800 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-3800 rivals Core i3-2100.

FeatureA8-3800Xeon E7-8890 v4
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6550D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Desktop