A8-3800 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4

A8-3800 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4 Performance Spectrum

A8-3800

4 / 4

2,051

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E7-8890 v4

24 / 48

2,054

+0.1%

Core 2 Duo E7600

Core i3-2370M

Pentium Dual Core T2370

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-3800 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-3800 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-3800

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6550D, while Xeon E7-8890 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Xeon E7-8890 v4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E7-8890 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,051 vs 2,054).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8890 v4, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $130 MSRP, while Xeon E7-8890 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E7-8890 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.

Trade-offs

❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-3800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-3800.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E7-8890 v4 better than A8-3800?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-8890 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A8-3800 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E7-8890 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-8890 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E7-8890 v4 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E7-8890 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $130 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. A8-3800 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (15.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on FM1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E7-8890 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-3800 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-3800

The A8-3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $90.

Xeon E7-8890 v4

The Xeon E7-8890 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,054 points. Launch price was $7,174.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-3800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon E7-8890 v4 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A8-3800 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-8890 v4 — a 23% clock advantage for the Xeon E7-8890 v4 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The A8-3800 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3800 scores 2,051 against the Xeon E7-8890 v4's 2,054 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E7-8890 v4. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3800 vs 60 MB on the Xeon E7-8890 v4.

Feature	A8-3800	Xeon E7-8890 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	24 / 48+500%
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	3.4 GHz+26%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+9%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	60 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	6 MB+500%
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	2,051	2,054
Geekbench 6 Single	370	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,350	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3800 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-3800	Xeon E7-8890 v4
Socket	FM1	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-3800) / not specified (Xeon E7-8890 v4). The A8-3800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6550D), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3800 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-3800 rivals Core i3-2100.