Pentium G640 vs Pentium G6951

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium G640 vs Pentium G6951 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium G640 vs Pentium G6951: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium G640

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
✅Delivers 37.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.4 vs 15.5 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 73W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,369 vs 1,383).

Pentium G6951

2010

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 21.4 PassMark/$ ($89 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G6951 better than Pentium G640?

Yes. Pentium G6951 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G6951 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G6951 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium G6951 comes in 39.1% more expensive on MSRP at $89 MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G640 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 37.7% better value on paper (21.4 vs 15.5 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G640 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium G640 vs Pentium G6951 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium G640

The Pentium G640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,369 points. Launch price was $179.

Pentium G6951

The Pentium G6951 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,383 points. Launch price was $94.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium G640 and Pentium G6951 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G640 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G6951 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Pentium G640 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G6951 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G640 scores 1,369 against the Pentium G6951's 1,383 — a 1% lead for the Pentium G6951. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Pentium G640	Pentium G6951
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,369	1,383+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G640 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G6951 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium G640	Pentium G6951
Socket	LGA1155	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Pentium G640 was priced at $64, while the Pentium G6951 came in at $89. On launch pricing ($64 vs $89), Pentium G640 was $25 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium G640 delivers 21.4 pts/$ vs 15.5 pts/$ for the Pentium G6951 — making the Pentium G640 the 31.7% better value option.

Feature	Pentium G640	Pentium G6951
MSRP	$64-28%	$89
Performance per Dollar	21.4+38%	15.5
Release Date	2012	2010

Search Pentium G640 on Amazon

Search Pentium G6951 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.