A4-5300 vs Pentium G640

A4-5300 vs Pentium G640 Performance Spectrum

A4-5300

2 / 2

1,367

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium G640

2 / 2

1,369

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-5300 vs Pentium G640 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-5300 vs Pentium G640: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-5300

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7480D, while Pentium G640 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium G640.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,367 vs 1,369).

Pentium G640

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $64 MSRP, while A4-5300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-5300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-5300.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G640 better than A4-5300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-5300 is ahead with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G640 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G640 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G640 is the better buy right now. Pentium G640 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $64 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that A4-5300 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (21.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G640 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-5300 vs Pentium G640 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-5300

The A4-5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,367 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium G640

The Pentium G640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,369 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-5300 and Pentium G640 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the A4-5300 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G640 — a 25% clock advantage for the A4-5300 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A4-5300 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G640 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5300 scores 1,367 against the Pentium G640's 1,369 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium G640. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-5300 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G640.

Feature	A4-5300	Pentium G640
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+29%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+21%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,367	1,369
Geekbench 6 Single	372	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-5300 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G640 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-5300	Pentium G640
Socket	FM2	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-5300) / not specified (Pentium G640). The A4-5300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7480D), while the Pentium G640 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5300 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-5300 rivals Celeron G1620.