A4-5300 vs Pentium G630

A4-5300 vs Pentium G630 Performance Spectrum

A4-5300

2 / 2

1,367

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium G630

2 / 2

1,354

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-5300 vs Pentium G630 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-5300 vs Pentium G630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-5300

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7480D, while Pentium G630 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium G630.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium G630

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,354 vs 1,367).
❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while A4-5300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-5300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-5300.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-5300 better than Pentium G630?

Yes. A4-5300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-5300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-5300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-5300 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4-5300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $75 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G630 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (18.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-5300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-5300 vs Pentium G630 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-5300

The A4-5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,367 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium G630

The Pentium G630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,354 points. Launch price was $100.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-5300 and Pentium G630 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the A4-5300 versus 2.7 GHz on the Pentium G630 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the A4-5300 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The A4-5300 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G630 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5300 scores 1,367 against the Pentium G630's 1,354 — a 1% lead for the A4-5300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-5300 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G630.

Feature	A4-5300	Pentium G630
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+33%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+26%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,367	1,354
Geekbench 6 Single	372	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-5300 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G630 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-5300	Pentium G630
Socket	FM2	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-5300) / not specified (Pentium G630). The A4-5300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7480D), while the Pentium G630 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5300 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-5300 rivals Celeron G1620.