A4-5300 vs Core i3-2370M

A4-5300 vs Core i3-2370M Performance Spectrum

A4-5300

2 / 2

1,367

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-2370M

2 / 4

1,370

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-5300 vs Core i3-2370M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-5300 vs Core i3-2370M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-5300

2012

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-2370M.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (372 vs 412).
❌Lower PassMark (1,367 vs 1,370).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Core i3-2370M

2012

Why buy it

✅+10.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while A4-5300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-5300.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2370M better than A4-5300?

Yes. Core i3-2370M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-2370M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2370M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2370M is the better buy right now. Core i3-2370M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $225 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2370M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-5300 vs Core i3-2370M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-5300

The A4-5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,367 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i3-2370M

The Core i3-2370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-5300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2370M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the A4-5300 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-2370M — a 40% clock advantage for the A4-5300 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A4-5300 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-2370M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5300 scores 1,367 against the Core i3-2370M's 1,370 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-2370M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 372 vs 412, a 10.2% lead for the Core i3-2370M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-5300 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2370M.

Feature	A4-5300	Core i3-2370M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+50%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+42%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,367	1,370
Geekbench 6 Single	372	412+11%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	711

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-5300 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-2370M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4-5300 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2370M — the A4-5300 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-5300 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X (A4-5300) and HM65,HM67,QM67 (Core i3-2370M).

Feature	A4-5300	Core i3-2370M
Socket	FM2	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-5300) vs VT-x (Core i3-2370M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7480D (A4-5300) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2370M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5300 targets Budget Desktop, Core i3-2370M targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-5300 rivals Celeron G1620.