A4-5300 vs Core i3-4010Y

A4-5300 vs Core i3-4010Y Performance Spectrum

A4-5300

2 / 2

1,367

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4010Y

2 / 4

1,358

0.0%

Celeron 867

Celeron P4500

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-5300 vs Core i3-4010Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-5300 vs Core i3-4010Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-5300

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-4010Y.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-4010Y

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,358 vs 1,367).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-5300.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-5300 better than Core i3-4010Y?

Yes. A4-5300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-5300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-5300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-5300 still makes the most sense overall. A4-5300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4010Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-5300 vs Core i3-4010Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-5300

The A4-5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,367 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i3-4010Y

The Core i3-4010Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,358 points. Launch price was $297.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-5300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-4010Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the A4-5300 versus 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-4010Y — a 93.9% clock advantage for the A4-5300 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The A4-5300 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4010Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5300 scores 1,367 against the Core i3-4010Y's 1,358 — a 0.7% lead for the A4-5300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-5300 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4010Y.

Feature	A4-5300	Core i3-4010Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+177%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+162%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,367	1,358
Geekbench 6 Single	372	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-5300 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4010Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The A4-5300 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-5300) vs 12 (Core i3-4010Y) — the A4-5300 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-5300	Core i3-4010Y
Socket	FM2	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-5300) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4010Y). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7480D (A4-5300) and HD Graphics 4200 (Core i3-4010Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5300 targets Budget Desktop, Core i3-4010Y targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A4-5300 rivals Celeron G1620.