Pentium G860
VS
Celeron N2810

Pentium G860 vs Celeron N2810

Intel

Pentium G860

2 Cores2 Thrd256 WWMax: 3 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Celeron N2810

2 Cores2 Thrd7 WWMax: 2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium G860 is positioned at rank 861 and the Celeron N2810 is on rank 605, so the Celeron N2810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G860

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
18050%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
17055%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12383%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3731%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2955%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2585%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1481%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1461%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1331%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1330%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1316%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1280%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1262%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1257%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1246%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
95%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
100%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
99%
#863
Core i7-2700K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $45
99%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
99%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
98%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
98%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
98%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
96%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
96%
#871
Core i7-4770TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $303
96%
#872
Core i5-4570T
MSRP: $195|Avg: $45
96%
#873
Athlon II X2 260u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
96%
#875
A4-3420
MSRP: $65|Avg: $30
95%
#876
Core i5-5675R
MSRP: $339|Avg: $392
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2810

#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
99%
#593
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
796%
#594
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
785%
#595
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
720%
#596
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
717%
#597
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
710%
#599
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
686%
#600
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
658%
#601
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
657%
#602
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
639%
#605
Celeron N2810
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#608
Ryzen AI 5 330
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium G860 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron N2810 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium G860Celeron N2810
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($36)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium G860Celeron N2810
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($36)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium G860 and Celeron N2810

Intel

Pentium G860

The Pentium G860 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,485 points. Launch price was $75.

Intel

Celeron N2810

The Celeron N2810 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,474 points. Launch price was $260.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium G860 and Celeron N2810 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Pentium G860 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron N2810 — a 40% clock advantage for the Pentium G860 (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Pentium G860 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N2810 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G860 scores 1,485 against the Celeron N2810's 1,474 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium G860. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G860 vs 0 kB on the Celeron N2810.

FeaturePentium G860Celeron N2810
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz+50%
2 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+50%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,485
1,474
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G860 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N2810 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Pentium G860 versus 1066 on the Celeron N2810 — the Celeron N2810 supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G860 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Pentium G860) vs 4 (Celeron N2810) — the Pentium G860 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeaturePentium G860Celeron N2810
Socket
LGA1155
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
1066+35433%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+419430300%
8
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+300%
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Pentium G860) vs true (Celeron N2810). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Pentium G860) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2810) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G860 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2810 rivals AMD A4-1250.

FeaturePentium G860Celeron N2810
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
true
Target Use
Desktop