Pentium G860
VS
Core 2 Duo SU7300

Pentium G860 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300

Intel

Pentium G860

2 Cores2 Thrd256 WWMax: 3 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium G860 is positioned at rank 861 and the Core 2 Duo SU7300 is on rank 43, so the Core 2 Duo SU7300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G860

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
18050%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
17055%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12383%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3731%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2955%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2585%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1481%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1461%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1331%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1330%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1316%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1280%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1262%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1257%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1246%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
95%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
100%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
99%
#863
Core i7-2700K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $45
99%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
99%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
98%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
98%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
98%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
96%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
96%
#871
Core i7-4770TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $303
96%
#872
Core i5-4570T
MSRP: $195|Avg: $45
96%
#873
Athlon II X2 260u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
96%
#875
A4-3420
MSRP: $65|Avg: $30
95%
#876
Core i5-5675R
MSRP: $339|Avg: $392
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo SU7300

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
95%
#31
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
196%
#32
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
193%
#33
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
177%
#34
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
177%
#35
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
175%
#37
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
169%
#38
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
162%
#39
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
162%
#40
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
157%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
100%
#51
Celeron N2807
MSRP: $107|Avg: $60
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium G860 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo SU7300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium G860Core 2 Duo SU7300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($36)
⚠️ Higher cost ($289)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium G860 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 88% cheaper ($36 vs $289) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium G860Core 2 Duo SU7300
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+697%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($36)
⚠️ Higher cost ($289)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium G860 and Core 2 Duo SU7300

Intel

Pentium G860

The Pentium G860 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,485 points. Launch price was $75.

Intel

Core 2 Duo SU7300

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,496 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium G860 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Pentium G860 versus 1.3 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 — a 79.1% clock advantage for the Pentium G860 (base: 3 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Pentium G860 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G860 scores 1,485 against the Core 2 Duo SU7300's 1,496 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo SU7300. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G860 vs 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core 2 Duo SU7300.

FeaturePentium G860Core 2 Duo SU7300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz+131%
1.3 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+131%
1.3 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
3 MB+1100%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,485
1,496
Geekbench 6 Single
188
Geekbench 6 Multi
338
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G860 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Pentium G860 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Pentium G860) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo SU7300) — the Pentium G860 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeaturePentium G860Core 2 Duo SU7300
Socket
LGA1155
BGA956
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Pentium G860 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G860 targets Desktop, Core 2 Duo SU7300 targets Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop.

FeaturePentium G860Core 2 Duo SU7300
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop
Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium G860 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 debuted at $289.

FeaturePentium G860Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP
$86-70%
$289
Avg Price (30d)
$36
Release Date
2011
2009