Pentium III 1400 vs Sempron 2200+

Pentium III 1400 vs Sempron 2200+ Performance Spectrum

Pentium III 1400

1 / 1

228

0.0%

265

+16.2%

Athlon XP 1600+

Athlon XP 1800+

Ryzen 7 4700GE

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium III 1400 vs Sempron 2200+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium III 1400 vs Sempron 2200+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium III 1400

2001

Why buy it

✅Draws 31W instead of 62W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Sempron 2200+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (228 vs 265).
❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Sempron 2200+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Sempron 2200+

2001

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 62W vs 31W.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron 2200+ better than Pentium III 1400?

Yes. Sempron 2200+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 16.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 16.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Sempron 2200+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 2200+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 16.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron 2200+ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Sempron 2200+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium III 1400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2001 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (0.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA370.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron 2200+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium III 1400 vs Sempron 2200+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium III 1400

The Pentium III 1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tualatin (2000−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA370. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 228 points. Launch price was $69.

Sempron 2200+

The Sempron 2200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $30.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium III 1400 and Sempron 2200+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Pentium III 1400 versus 1.5 GHz on the Sempron 2200+ — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Sempron 2200+. The Pentium III 1400 uses the Tualatin (2000−2002) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 2200+ uses Barton (2001−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium III 1400 scores 228 against the Sempron 2200+'s 265 — a 15% lead for the Sempron 2200+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Pentium III 1400	Sempron 2200+
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	1.5 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB	256 kB
Process	130 nm	130 nm
Architecture	Tualatin (2000−2002)	Barton (2001−2004)
PassMark	228	265+16%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium III 1400 uses the PGA370 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 2200+ uses A (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.