Pentium III 1400 vs Z-01

Intel

Pentium III 1400

1 Cores1 Thrd31 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2001
VS
AMD

Z-01

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 1 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Pentium III 1400 vs Z-01 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium III 1400 vs Z-01: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium III 1400

2001

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +20.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 4.3 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 416.7% higher power demand at 31W vs 6W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Z-01 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Z-01

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $200 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 371.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 4.3 vs 0.9 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Draws 6W instead of 31W, a 25W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6250, while Pentium III 1400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium III 1400 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (215 vs 228).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium III 1400 better than Z-01?
Yes. Pentium III 1400 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 20.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Pentium III 1400 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 20.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium III 1400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium III 1400 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Pentium III 1400 comes in 400.0% more expensive on MSRP at $250 MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Z-01 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 20.0% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Z-01 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2001). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium III 1400 vs Z-01 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Pentium III 1400

The Pentium III 1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tualatin (2000−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA370. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 228 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Z-01

The Z-01 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Desna (2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 215 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Pentium III 1400 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Z-01 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Z-01 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Pentium III 1400 versus 1 GHz on the Z-01 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Pentium III 1400. The Pentium III 1400 uses the Tualatin (2000−2002) architecture (130 nm), while the Z-01 uses Desna (2011) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium III 1400 scores 228 against the Z-01's 215 — a 5.9% lead for the Pentium III 1400. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeaturePentium III 1400Z-01
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz+40%
1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB
1 MB+300%
Process
130 nm
40 nm-69%
Architecture
Tualatin (2000−2002)
Desna (2011)
PassMark
228+6%
215
Geekbench 6 Single
100
Geekbench 6 Multi
180
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium III 1400 uses the PGA370 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Z-01 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium III 1400Z-01
Socket
PGA370
FT1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium III 1400) / AMD-V (Z-01). The Z-01 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6250), while the Pentium III 1400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Z-01 targets Tablet/Netbook.

FeaturePentium III 1400Z-01
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6250
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Tablet/Netbook
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Pentium III 1400 was priced at $250, while the Z-01 came in at $50. On launch pricing ($250 vs $50), Z-01 was $200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium III 1400 delivers 0.9 pts/$ vs 4.3 pts/$ for the Z-01 — making the Z-01 the 130% better value option.

FeaturePentium III 1400Z-01
MSRP
$250
$50-80%
Performance per Dollar
0.9
4.3+378%
Release Date
2001
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.