Pentium J2850 vs Athlon II X2 215
Pentium J2850
Athlon II X2 215
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium J2850 is positioned at rank 1057 and the Athlon II X2 215 is on rank 739, so the Athlon II X2 215 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium J2850
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 215
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium J2850 | Athlon II X2 215 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($94) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium J2850 | Athlon II X2 215 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+835%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($94) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium J2850 and Athlon II X2 215
Pentium J2850
The Pentium J2850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,016 points. Launch price was $94.
Athlon II X2 215
The Athlon II X2 215 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,011 points. Launch price was $45.
Processing Power
The Pentium J2850 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X2 215 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium J2850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Pentium J2850 versus 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X2 215 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 215 (base: 2.41 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Pentium J2850 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon II X2 215 uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium J2850 scores 1,016 against the Athlon II X2 215's 1,011 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium J2850. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium J2850 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 215.
| Feature | Pentium J2850 | Athlon II X2 215 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.7 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.41 GHz | 2.7 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 512 kB |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-D (2013) | Regor (2009−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,016 | 1,011 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 274 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 674 |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium J2850 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 215 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Pentium J2850 | Athlon II X2 215 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Pentium J2850) / true (Athlon II X2 215). Primary use case: Athlon II X2 215 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 215 rivals Pentium E5400.
| Feature | Pentium J2850 | Athlon II X2 215 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Pentium J2850 launched at $94 MSRP, while the Athlon II X2 215 debuted at $45. At current prices ($94 vs $10), the Athlon II X2 215 is $84 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium J2850 delivers 10.8 pts/$ vs 101.1 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 215 — making the Athlon II X2 215 the 161.4% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium J2850 | Athlon II X2 215 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $94 | $45-52% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $94 | $10-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.8 | 101.1+836% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Pentium J2850 and Athlon II X2 215
