Pentium J2850
VS
Core 2 Duo E8235

Pentium J2850 vs Core 2 Duo E8235

Intel

Pentium J2850

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E8235

2 Cores2 Thrd44 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Pentium J2850 is positioned at rank #1057 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium J2850

#1045
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2714%
#1046
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2674%
#1047
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2455%
#1048
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2444%
#1049
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2422%
#1051
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2339%
#1052
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2242%
#1053
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2239%
#1054
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2179%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
100%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
100%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
99%
#1060
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
99%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
99%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
98%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
97%
#1067
Athlon II N350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
97%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
96%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
96%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core 2 Duo E8235 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium J2850 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium J2850Core 2 Duo E8235
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($94)
More affordable ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core 2 Duo E8235 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 79% cheaper ($20 vs $94) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium J2850Core 2 Duo E8235
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+372%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($94)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium J2850 and Core 2 Duo E8235

Intel

Pentium J2850

The Pentium J2850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,016 points. Launch price was $94.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8235

The Core 2 Duo E8235 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Pentium J2850 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo E8235 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium J2850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Pentium J2850 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8235 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8235 (base: 2.41 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Pentium J2850 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8235 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium J2850 scores 1,016 against the Core 2 Duo E8235's 1,020 — a 0.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8235.

FeaturePentium J2850Core 2 Duo E8235
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
2.8 GHz+17%
Base Clock
2.41 GHz
2.8 GHz+16%
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB (total)+200%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-D (2013)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,016
1,020
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium J2850 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8235 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium J2850Core 2 Duo E8235
Socket
FCBGA1170
P
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium J2850 launched at $94 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E8235 debuted at $0. At current prices ($94 vs $20), the Core 2 Duo E8235 is $74 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium J2850 delivers 10.8 pts/$ vs 51.0 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E8235 — making the Core 2 Duo E8235 the 130.1% better value option.

FeaturePentium J2850Core 2 Duo E8235
MSRP
$94
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$94
$20-79%
Performance per Dollar
10.8
51.0+372%
Release Date
2013
2009