Pentium J3710
VS
Celeron 5205U

Pentium J3710 vs Celeron 5205U

Intel

Pentium J3710

4 Cores4 Thrd6.5 WWMax: 2.64 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Celeron 5205U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium J3710 is positioned at rank 618 and the Celeron 5205U is on rank 1231, so the Pentium J3710 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium J3710

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10976%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10371%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7530%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2269%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1797%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1572%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
900%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
889%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
809%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
809%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
800%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
778%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
768%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
764%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
757%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
97%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
97%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
99%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
98%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
98%
#618
Pentium J3710
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#619
Core i5-7640X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $85
100%
#620
Athlon II X3 425e
MSRP: $79|Avg: $58
100%
#621
Athlon II X4 640
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#622
Celeron G540
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
99%
#624
Core i5-4590
MSRP: $192|Avg: $51
99%
#625
Celeron G440
MSRP: $37|Avg: $5
98%
#628
A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $43
98%
#629
Core i3-8350K
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
97%
#630
Core i3-6320
MSRP: $160|Avg: $35
97%
#632
Pentium G3258
MSRP: $75|Avg: $72
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 5205U

#1218
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
8811%
#1219
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
8682%
#1220
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
7970%
#1221
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
7934%
#1222
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
7861%
#1224
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
7592%
#1225
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
7279%
#1226
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
7267%
#1227
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
7072%
#1230
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
100%
#1231
Celeron 5205U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1232
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
84%
#1234
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
71%
#1235
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
64%
#1236
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
62%
#1237
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
61%
#1239
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
55%
#1240
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
51%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 5205U (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPentium J3710Celeron 5205U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Airmont (2016) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium J3710 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3L-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPentium J3710Celeron 5205U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium J3710 and Celeron 5205U

Intel

Pentium J3710

The Pentium J3710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.64 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,420 points. Launch price was $161.

Intel

Celeron 5205U

The Celeron 5205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,432 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

The Pentium J3710 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron 5205U offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium J3710 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.64 GHz on the Pentium J3710 versus 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 5205U — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Pentium J3710 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Pentium J3710 uses the Airmont (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron 5205U uses Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium J3710 scores 1,420 against the Celeron 5205U's 1,432 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron 5205U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium J3710 vs 2 MB on the Celeron 5205U.

FeaturePentium J3710Celeron 5205U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.64 GHz+39%
1.9 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
1.9 GHz+19%
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Airmont (2016)
Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)
PassMark
1,420
1,432
Geekbench 6 Single
385
Geekbench 6 Multi
650
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium J3710 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 5205U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium J3710Celeron 5205U
Socket
FCBGA1170
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium J3710) / VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 5205U). The Celeron 5205U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)), while the Pentium J3710 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 5205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 5205U rivals Pentium Gold 6405U.

FeaturePentium J3710Celeron 5205U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget