Pentium M 1.30 vs Celeron 2.30

Pentium M 1.30

1 Cores1 Thrd24 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2003

Celeron 2.30

1 Cores1 Thrd73 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Pentium M 1.30

1 / 1

315

0.0%

325

+3.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 1.30 is positioned at rank 676 and the Celeron 2.30 is on rank 1092, so the Pentium M 1.30 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 1.30

#664

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

931%

#665

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

918%

#666

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

843%

#667

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

839%

#668

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

831%

#670

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

803%

#671

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

770%

#672

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

768%

#673

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

748%

#676

Pentium M 1.30

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#681

Core i3-N305

MSRP: $309|Avg: $309

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.30

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

95912%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

90628%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

65803%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

19824%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

15702%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

13737%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

7868%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

7765%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

7070%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

7070%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

6990%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

6802%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

6707%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

6680%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

6619%

#1092

Celeron 2.30

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

100%

#1093

Phenom X4 9450e

MSRP: $450|Avg: $430

99%

#1094

Athlon 64 X2 3800+

MSRP: $354|Avg: $20

95%

#1095

Athlon 64 3000+

MSRP: $149|Avg: $10

93%

#1096

Athlon XP 3100+

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

87%

#1097

Athlon 64 3300+

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

80%

#1098

Athlon 64 2800+

MSRP: $178|Avg: $15

73%

#1099

Athlon 64 3700+

MSRP: $272|Avg: $20

70%

#1100

Athlon 64 FX-72

MSRP: $799|Avg: $40

69%

#1101

Athlon 64 X2 4200+

MSRP: $581|Avg: $110

66%

#1102

Athlon 64 3500+

MSRP: $272|Avg: $10

65%

#1103

Pentium D 830

MSRP: $316|Avg: $20

60%

#1104

Pentium D 960

MSRP: $523|Avg: $15

59%

#1105

Athlon XP 2500+

MSRP: $172|Avg: $15

57%

#1106

Athlon 64 3800+

MSRP: $354|Avg: $10

56%

#1107

Pentium 4 2.53

MSRP: $193|Avg: $13

55%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron 2.30 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium M 1.30 in both compute-intensive tasks (3.1% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Pentium M 1.30	Celeron 2.30
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Banias (2003) / 130 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Pentium M 1.30	Celeron 2.30
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Pentium M 1.30 Benchmark Check

Celeron 2.30 Benchmark Check

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 1.30 and Celeron 2.30

Pentium M 1.30

The Pentium M 1.30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 315 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron 2.30

The Celeron 2.30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 1.30 and Celeron 2.30 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Pentium M 1.30 versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron 2.30 — a 55.6% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.30. The Pentium M 1.30 uses the Banias (2003) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron 2.30 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 1.30 scores 315 against the Celeron 2.30's 325 — a 3.1% lead for the Celeron 2.30. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Pentium M 1.30	Celeron 2.30
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	2.3 GHz+77%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB+700%	128 kB
Process	130 nm	130 nm
Architecture	Banias (2003)	Northwood (2002−2004)
PassMark	315	325+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.

Feature	Pentium M 1.30	Celeron 2.30
Socket	PGA478	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR1-400
Max RAM Capacity	—	4 GB
RAM Channels	—	1
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium M 1.30) / No (Celeron 2.30). Primary use case: Celeron 2.30 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.30 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.