Pentium M 1.60
VS
Celeron 2.60

Pentium M 1.60 vs Celeron 2.60

Intel

Pentium M 1.60

1 Cores1 Thrd24 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2003
VS
Intel

Celeron 2.60

1 Cores1 Thrd73 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 1.60 is positioned at rank 1133 and the Celeron 2.60 is on rank 1045, so the Celeron 2.60 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 1.60

#1120
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3622%
#1121
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3569%
#1122
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3277%
#1123
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3262%
#1124
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3232%
#1126
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3121%
#1127
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2993%
#1128
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2988%
#1129
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2907%
#1132
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
100%
#1133
Pentium M 1.60
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1134
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
96%
#1135
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1136
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
95%
#1137
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
95%
#1138
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1140
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
94%
#1141
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
94%
#1142
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
94%
#1143
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
94%
#1145
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
93%
#1146
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.60

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
42936%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
40570%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
29457%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8874%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
7029%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6149%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3522%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3476%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3165%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3165%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3129%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3045%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3002%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2990%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2963%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
100%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
98%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
97%
#1048
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
97%
#1049
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
96%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
95%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
94%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
94%
#1053
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
94%
#1054
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
93%
#1055
Pentium D 940
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
91%
#1056
Phenom X4 9600B
MSRP: $278|Avg: $20
91%
#1057
Phenom II X3 B77
MSRP: $281|Avg: $35
90%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
89%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
88%
#1060
Core 2 Duo E8300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron 2.60 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium M 1.60 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 5.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium M 1.60Celeron 2.60
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Banias (2003) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium M 1.60Celeron 2.60
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 1.60 and Celeron 2.60

Intel

Pentium M 1.60

The Pentium M 1.60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron 2.60

The Celeron 2.60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 1.60 and Celeron 2.60 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 1.60 versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron 2.60 — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.60. The Pentium M 1.60 uses the Banias (2003) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron 2.60 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 1.60 scores 405 against the Celeron 2.60's 385 — a 5.1% lead for the Pentium M 1.60. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeaturePentium M 1.60Celeron 2.60
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
2.6 GHz+63%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB+700%
128 kB
Process
130 nm
130 nm
Architecture
Banias (2003)
Northwood (2002−2004)
PassMark
405+5%
385
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.

FeaturePentium M 1.60Celeron 2.60
Socket
PGA478
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium M 1.60) / No (Celeron 2.60). Primary use case: Celeron 2.60 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.60 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.

FeaturePentium M 1.60Celeron 2.60
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget