Pentium M 1.60 vs Sempron LE-1150

Pentium M 1.60 vs Sempron LE-1150 Performance Spectrum

Pentium M 1.60

1 / 1

405

+3.8%

390

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 1.60 vs Sempron LE-1150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 1.60 vs Sempron LE-1150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 1.60

2003

Why buy it

✅+3.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 24W instead of 45W, a 21W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Sempron LE-1150

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (390 vs 405).
❌87.5% higher power demand at 45W vs 24W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 1.60 better than Sempron LE-1150?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Sempron LE-1150 is ahead with 25% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 1.60 pulls ahead with 3.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 1.60 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 1.60 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 1.60 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 3.8% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron LE-1150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium M 1.60 vs Sempron LE-1150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium M 1.60

The Pentium M 1.60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.

Sempron LE-1150

The Sempron LE-1150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sparta (2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 390 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 1.60 and Sempron LE-1150 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 1.60 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron LE-1150 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Sempron LE-1150. The Pentium M 1.60 uses the Banias (2003) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron LE-1150 uses Sparta (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 1.60 scores 405 against the Sempron LE-1150's 390 — a 3.8% lead for the Pentium M 1.60. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Pentium M 1.60	Sempron LE-1150
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB
Process	130 nm	65 nm-50%
Architecture	Banias (2003)	Sparta (2007)
PassMark	405+4%	390

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 1.60 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron LE-1150 uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.