GX-210JA vs Pentium M 1.60

GX-210JA vs Pentium M 1.60 Performance Spectrum

GX-210JA

2 / 2

425

+4.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 1.60

1 / 1

405

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

GX-210JA vs Pentium M 1.60 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GX-210JA vs Pentium M 1.60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

GX-210JA

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 24W, a 23W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium M 1.60

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than GX-210JA across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 425).
❌2300% higher power demand at 24W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is GX-210JA better than Pentium M 1.60?

Yes. GX-210JA is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 4.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, GX-210JA is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, GX-210JA is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

GX-210JA still makes the most sense overall. GX-210JA comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GX-210JA makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

GX-210JA vs Pentium M 1.60 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GX-210JA

The GX-210JA is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium M 1.60

The Pentium M 1.60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The GX-210JA packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 1.60 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the GX-210JA has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the GX-210JA versus 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 1.60 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Pentium M 1.60. The GX-210JA uses the Temash (2013) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium M 1.60 uses Banias (2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the GX-210JA scores 425 against the Pentium M 1.60's 405 — a 4.8% lead for the GX-210JA.

Feature	GX-210JA	Pentium M 1.60
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1 GHz	1.6 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	28 nm-78%	130 nm
Architecture	Temash (2013)	Banias (2003)
PassMark	425+5%	405

🧠

Memory & Platform

The GX-210JA uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium M 1.60 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.