
GX-210JA
AMD
PassMark
425
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Overview
The GX-210JA is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $69.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The GX-210JA is positioned at rank #1119 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GX-210JA
FPS Benchmarks
Predicted performance for GX-210JA across popular games. Tested paired with RTX 4090 to isolate CPU performance.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Analysis
Detailed breakdown of GX-210JA specifications and capabilities.
Processing Power
The GX-210JA is a 2-core / 2-thread processor based on the Temash (2013) architecture, manufactured on a 28 nm process node. It reaches a maximum boost clock of 1 GHz— higher boost clocks directly translate to better single-threaded performance and responsiveness in gaming. In the PassMark benchmark (a comprehensive multi-threaded test), it scores 425, placing it in the Entry Level performance tier as a Legacy generation product.
| Specification | GX-210JA |
|---|---|
| Cores / ThreadsPhysical/logical processing units | 2C / 2T |
| Max Boost ClockPeak single-core speed under boost | 1 GHz |
| ArchitectureCPU microarchitecture design | Temash (2013) |
| Process NodeFabrication technology — smaller = more efficient | 28 nm |
| L2 CachePer-core fast cache for frequently accessed data | 1 MB |
| L1 CacheUltra-fast per-core cache | 128 kB |
| 64-bit Support | Yes |
| Windows 11 Compatible | No |
| PassMark ScoreOverall multi-threaded benchmark score | 425 |
Memory & Platform
The GX-210JA fits into the FT3 socket and supports PCIe 3.0. It supports DDR3 memory.
| Specification | GX-210JA |
|---|---|
| TypeDesktop or Laptop processor | Laptop |
| SeriesProduct family | AMD |
| SocketMotherboard socket required | FT3 |
| PCIe GenerationPeripheral interconnect speed — affects GPU and SSD bandwidth | PCIe 3.0 |
| RAM TypeSupported memory standard | DDR3 |
Power & Cooling
The GX-210JA has a rated TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 1 MB — this indicates the amount of heat generated under sustained load and determines what cooling solution is needed.
| Specification | GX-210JA |
|---|---|
| TDPThermal Design Power — heat output under sustained workload | 1 MB |
Value Analysis
It currently holds Rank #1119 in the overall cost-benefit ranking — this ranking factors in performance-per-dollar relative to all available processors. Performance ranking position: #3591 out of all indexed processors.
| Specification | GX-210JA |
|---|---|
| Launch PriceOriginal retail price at launch | $69 |
| Cost-Benefit RankPosition in overall value ranking | #1119 |
| Performance RankPosition in overall performance ranking | #3591 |
| Release DateLaunch date | 23 May 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Release Year | 2013 |
| DesignerArchitecture designer (e.g. Intel, AMD) | AMD |
Similar Performance
Processors with benchmark scores closest to the current hardware, grouped by manufacturer.
Intel (12)












AMD (12)












Our Recommendation for GX-210JA
Suggested pairings based on performance balance
Minimum (Avoid Bottleneck) (12)









Recommended (Balanced) (12)











High-End (Max Performance) (12)












Popular Comparisons
Compare GX-210JA with other popular CPUs
Compare GX-210JA
See how this CPU stacks up against similar alternatives
Better Alternatives (8)
















Similar or Lower Performance (8)

















