Athlon XP 3000+
GX-210JA
Athlon XP 3000+ vs GX-210JA Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon XP 3000+ vs GX-210JA FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon XP 3000+ vs GX-210JA: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon XP 3000+
2001Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than GX-210JA across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (408 vs 425).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $588 MSRP, while GX-210JA mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌6700% higher power demand at 68W vs 1W.
GX-210JA
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 68W, a 67W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GX-210JA better than Athlon XP 3000+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon XP 3000+ vs GX-210JA Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon XP 3000+
The Athlon XP 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.17 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $78.
GX-210JA
The GX-210JA is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon XP 3000+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the GX-210JA offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the GX-210JA has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.17 GHz on the Athlon XP 3000+ versus 1 GHz on the GX-210JA — a 73.8% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 3000+. The Athlon XP 3000+ uses the Barton (2001−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the GX-210JA uses Temash (2013) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 3000+ scores 408 against the GX-210JA's 425 — a 4.1% lead for the GX-210JA.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | GX-210JA |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.17 GHz+117% | 1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 130 nm | 28 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Barton (2001−2004) | Temash (2013) |
| PassMark | 408 | 425+4% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon XP 3000+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the GX-210JA uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | GX-210JA |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | A | FT3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon XP 3000+ and GX-210JA
