Athlon XP 3000+
Sempron 3300+
Athlon XP 3000+ vs Sempron 3300+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon XP 3000+ vs Sempron 3300+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon XP 3000+ vs Sempron 3300+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon XP 3000+
2001Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (408 vs 412).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $588 MSRP, while Sempron 3300+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Sempron 3300+
2001Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 62W instead of 68W, a 6W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Sempron 3300+ better than Athlon XP 3000+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon XP 3000+ vs Sempron 3300+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon XP 3000+
The Athlon XP 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.17 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $78.
Sempron 3300+
The Sempron 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 412 points. Launch price was $30.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon XP 3000+ and Sempron 3300+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.17 GHz on the Athlon XP 3000+ versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3300+ — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 3000+. The Athlon XP 3000+ uses the Barton (2001−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 3300+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 3000+ scores 408 against the Sempron 3300+'s 412 — a 1% lead for the Sempron 3300+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | Sempron 3300+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.17 GHz+8% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512K |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Barton (2001−2004) | Palermo (2001−2005) |
| PassMark | 408 | 412 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon XP 3000+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3300+ uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | Sempron 3300+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | A | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon XP 3000+ and Sempron 3300+
