
Athlon XP 3000+

Atom N475
Athlon XP 3000+ vs Atom N475 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon XP 3000+ vs Atom N475 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon XP 3000+ vs Atom N475: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon XP 3000+
2001Why buy it
- ✅Draws 68W instead of 512W, a 444W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 5.4 PassMark/$ ($588 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N475 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Atom N475
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $513 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $588 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 678.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0.7 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $588 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Athlon XP 3000+ needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 408).
- ❌652.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 68W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon XP 3000+ better than Atom N475?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon XP 3000+ vs Atom N475 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon XP 3000+
The Athlon XP 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.17 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $78.

Atom N475
The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.
Processing Power
The Athlon XP 3000+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom N475's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.17 GHz on the Athlon XP 3000+ versus 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 — a 17% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 3000+. The Athlon XP 3000+ uses the Barton (2001−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Atom N475 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 3000+ scores 408 against the Atom N475's 405 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon XP 3000+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | Atom N475 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.17 GHz+19% | 1.83 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.83 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 130 nm | 45 nm-65% |
| Architecture | Barton (2001−2004) | Pineview (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 408 | 405 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon XP 3000+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom N475 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-333 on the Athlon XP 3000+ versus DDR3-667 on the Atom N475 — the Atom N475 supports -300.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon XP 3000+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 3000+) and Intel NM10 (Atom N475).
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | Atom N475 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | A | FCBGA559 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-333 | DDR3-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
The Atom N475 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Athlon XP 3000+ requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | Atom N475 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel GMA 3150 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon XP 3000+ was priced at $588, while the Atom N475 came in at $75. On launch pricing ($588 vs $75), Atom N475 was $513 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 3000+ delivers 0.7 pts/$ vs 5.4 pts/$ for the Atom N475 — making the Atom N475 the 154.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | Atom N475 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $588 | $75-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.7 | 5.4+671% |
| Release Date | 2001 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















