Athlon XP 3000+ vs Atom N475

AMD

Athlon XP 3000+

1 Cores1 Thrd68 WWMax: 2.17 GHz2001
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Atom N475

1 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Athlon XP 3000+ vs Atom N475 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 3000+ vs Atom N475 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 3000+ vs Atom N475: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 3000+

2001

Why buy it

  • Draws 68W instead of 512W, a 444W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 5.4 PassMark/$ ($588 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Atom N475 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Atom N475

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $513 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $588 MSRP).
  • Delivers 678.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0.7 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $588 MSRP).
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Athlon XP 3000+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (405 vs 408).
  • 652.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 68W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon XP 3000+ better than Atom N475?
Yes. Athlon XP 3000+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Athlon XP 3000+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon XP 3000+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon XP 3000+ is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Athlon XP 3000+ comes in 684.0% more expensive on MSRP at $588 MSRP versus $75 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Atom N475 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.2% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom N475 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2001). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon XP 3000+ vs Atom N475 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon XP 3000+

The Athlon XP 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.17 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $78.

Intel

Atom N475

The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.

Processing Power

The Athlon XP 3000+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom N475's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.17 GHz on the Athlon XP 3000+ versus 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 — a 17% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 3000+. The Athlon XP 3000+ uses the Barton (2001−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Atom N475 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 3000+ scores 408 against the Atom N475's 405 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon XP 3000+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon XP 3000+Atom N475
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 2
Boost Clock
2.17 GHz+19%
1.83 GHz
Base Clock
1.83 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512K (per core)
Process
130 nm
45 nm-65%
Architecture
Barton (2001−2004)
Pineview (2009−2011)
PassMark
408
405
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 3000+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom N475 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-333 on the Athlon XP 3000+ versus DDR3-667 on the Atom N475 — the Atom N475 supports -300.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon XP 3000+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 3000+) and Intel NM10 (Atom N475).

FeatureAthlon XP 3000+Atom N475
Socket
A
FCBGA559
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-333
DDR3-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom N475 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Athlon XP 3000+ requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAthlon XP 3000+Atom N475
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3150
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon XP 3000+ was priced at $588, while the Atom N475 came in at $75. On launch pricing ($588 vs $75), Atom N475 was $513 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 3000+ delivers 0.7 pts/$ vs 5.4 pts/$ for the Atom N475 — making the Atom N475 the 154.5% better value option.

FeatureAthlon XP 3000+Atom N475
MSRP
$588
$75-87%
Performance per Dollar
0.7
5.4+671%
Release Date
2001
2010

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.