CPU
GPU
Athlon XP 3000+
Atom N475
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon XP 3000+ is positioned at rank 1138 and the Atom N475 is on rank 193, so the Atom N475 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 3000+
Performance Per Dollar Atom N475
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon XP 3000+ | Atom N475 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($75) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Barton (2001−2004) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon XP 3000+ | Atom N475 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+278%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($75) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon XP 3000+ and Atom N475
Athlon XP 3000+
The Athlon XP 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.17 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $78.
Atom N475
The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.
Processing Power
The Athlon XP 3000+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom N475's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.17 GHz on the Athlon XP 3000+ versus 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 — a 17% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 3000+. The Athlon XP 3000+ uses the Barton (2001−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Atom N475 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 3000+ scores 408 against the Atom N475's 405 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon XP 3000+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | Atom N475 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.17 GHz+19% | 1.83 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.83 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 130 nm | 45 nm-65% |
| Architecture | Barton (2001−2004) | Pineview (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 408 | 405 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon XP 3000+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom N475 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-333 on the Athlon XP 3000+ versus DDR3-667 on the Atom N475 — the Atom N475 supports -203.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon XP 3000+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 3000+) and Intel NM10 (Atom N475).
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | Atom N475 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | A | FCBGA559 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-333 | DDR3-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
The Atom N475 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Athlon XP 3000+ requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | Atom N475 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel GMA 3150 |
Value Analysis
The Athlon XP 3000+ launched at $588 MSRP, while the Atom N475 debuted at $75.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | Atom N475 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $588 | $75-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Release Date | 2001 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon XP 3000+ and Atom N475
