CPU
GPU
Athlon XP 3000+
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon XP 3000+ is positioned at rank 1138 and the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is on rank 1157, so the Athlon XP 3000+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 3000+
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon XP 3000+ | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Barton (2001−2004) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Oakville (2003−2004) / Standard Node) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon XP 3000+ | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon XP 3000+ and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Athlon XP 3000+
The Athlon XP 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.17 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $78.
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon XP 3000+ and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.17 GHz on the Athlon XP 3000+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 3000+. The Athlon XP 3000+ uses the Barton (2001−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses Oakville (2003−2004). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 3000+ scores 408 against the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+'s 420 — a 2.9% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.17 GHz+21% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512K |
| Process | 130 nm | — |
| Architecture | Barton (2001−2004) | Oakville (2003−2004) |
| PassMark | 408 | 420+3% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon XP 3000+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-333 on the Athlon XP 3000+ versus 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ — the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ supports 2188.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon XP 3000+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 3000+) and 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+).
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | A | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-333 | 400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB+209715100% | 2 |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon XP 3000+) / false (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ rivals Pentium M 725.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | false |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon XP 3000+ and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
