
Athlon XP 3000+

Celeron D 352
Athlon XP 3000+ vs Celeron D 352 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon XP 3000+ vs Celeron D 352 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon XP 3000+ vs Celeron D 352: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon XP 3000+
2001Why buy it
- ✅Draws 68W instead of 84W, a 16W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (408 vs 418).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($588 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron D 352.
Celeron D 352
2006Why buy it
- ✅Costs $519 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $588 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 773.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0.7 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $588 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Athlon XP 3000+.
Trade-offs
- ❌23.5% higher power demand at 84W vs 68W.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron D 352 better than Athlon XP 3000+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon XP 3000+ vs Celeron D 352 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon XP 3000+
The Athlon XP 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.17 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $78.

Celeron D 352
The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon XP 3000+ and Celeron D 352 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.17 GHz on the Athlon XP 3000+ versus 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 — a 38.4% clock advantage for the Celeron D 352. The Athlon XP 3000+ uses the Barton (2001−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron D 352 uses Cedar Mill (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 3000+ scores 408 against the Celeron D 352's 418 — a 2.4% lead for the Celeron D 352. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | Celeron D 352 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.17 GHz | 3.2 GHz+47% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512 kB |
| Process | 130 nm | 65 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Barton (2001−2004) | Cedar Mill (2006) |
| PassMark | 408 | 418+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 180 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon XP 3000+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron D 352 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-333 on the Athlon XP 3000+ versus 800 on the Celeron D 352 — the Celeron D 352 supports -340.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon XP 3000+) vs 2 (Celeron D 352). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 3000+) and 865G,915,945,965,G31,G41 (Celeron D 352).
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | Celeron D 352 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | A | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-333 | 800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon XP 3000+) / false (Celeron D 352). Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | Celeron D 352 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | false |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon XP 3000+ was priced at $588, while the Celeron D 352 came in at $69. On launch pricing ($588 vs $69), Celeron D 352 was $519 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 3000+ delivers 0.7 pts/$ vs 6.1 pts/$ for the Celeron D 352 — making the Celeron D 352 the 158.9% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3000+ | Celeron D 352 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $588 | $69-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.7 | 6.1+771% |
| Release Date | 2001 | 2006 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















