Celeron 540
VS
GX-210JA

Celeron 540 vs GX-210JA

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 540 is positioned at rank 1212 and the GX-210JA is on rank 1119, so the GX-210JA offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 540

#1200
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6190%
#1201
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
6099%
#1202
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5599%
#1203
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5574%
#1204
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5523%
#1206
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5333%
#1207
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
5114%
#1208
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
5105%
#1209
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4968%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
100%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
98%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
97%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
97%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
96%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
94%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
93%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
91%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
88%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
86%
#1224
Core i5-560UM
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
86%
#1225
Core i7-660UM
MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A
85%
#1226
C-30
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar GX-210JA

#1107
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3452%
#1108
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3401%
#1109
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3122%
#1110
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3108%
#1111
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3080%
#1113
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2974%
#1114
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2852%
#1115
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2847%
#1116
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2771%
#1119
GX-210JA
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1120
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
97%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
97%
#1127
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
97%
#1128
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
97%
#1129
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
97%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
96%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
96%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The GX-210JA (2013) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 540GX-210JA
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron 540 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 540GX-210JA
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 540 and GX-210JA

Intel

Celeron 540

The Celeron 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

GX-210JA

The GX-210JA is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The GX-210JA is built on the Temash (2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 540 scores 408 against the GX-210JA's 425 — a 4.1% lead for the GX-210JA.

FeatureCeleron 540GX-210JA
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1 GHz
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
L3 Cache
1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
1 MB
Process
65 nm
28 nm-57%
Architecture
Temash (2013)
PassMark
408
425+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 540 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the GX-210JA uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 540GX-210JA
Socket
PGA478
FT3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 540) / not specified (GX-210JA). Primary use case: Celeron 540 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 540 rivals Pentium T2310.

FeatureCeleron 540GX-210JA
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget