CPU
GPU
Atom N475
Celeron 540
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N475 is positioned at rank 193 and the Celeron 540 is on rank 1212, so the Atom N475 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom N475
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 540
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom N475 | Celeron 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($75) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom N475 | Celeron 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1411%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($75) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom N475 and Celeron 540
Atom N475
The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.
Celeron 540
The Celeron 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Atom N475 is built on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Atom N475 scores 405 against the Celeron 540's 408 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron 540. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom N475 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 540.
| Feature | Atom N475 | Celeron 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 1.83 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 1.83 GHz | 1.86 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Pineview (2009−2011) | — |
| PassMark | 405 | 408 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom N475 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 540 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-667 on the Atom N475 versus DDR2-667 on the Celeron 540 — the Atom N475 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 540 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom N475) vs 2 (Celeron 540). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N475) and Santa Rosa (Celeron 540).
| Feature | Atom N475 | Celeron 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA559 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-667+50% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom N475) / No (Celeron 540). The Atom N475 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Celeron 540 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 540 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 540 rivals Pentium T2310.
| Feature | Atom N475 | Celeron 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel GMA 3150 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | No |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Atom N475 launched at $75 MSRP, while the Celeron 540 debuted at $86.
| Feature | Atom N475 | Celeron 540 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $75-13% | $86 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $5 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom N475 and Celeron 540
