Atom N475 vs Sempron LE-1150

Atom N475 vs Sempron LE-1150 Performance Spectrum

Atom N475

1 / 2

405

+3.8%

390

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom N475 vs Sempron LE-1150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom N475 vs Sempron LE-1150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom N475

2010

Why buy it

✅+3.8% higher PassMark.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Sempron LE-1150 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while Sempron LE-1150 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.

Sempron LE-1150

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (390 vs 405).
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N475 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom N475 better than Sempron LE-1150?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Sempron LE-1150 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom N475 pulls ahead with 3.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom N475 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom N475 is the better buy right now. Atom N475 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $75 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 3.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Sempron LE-1150 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom N475 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom N475 vs Sempron LE-1150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom N475

The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.

Sempron LE-1150

The Sempron LE-1150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sparta (2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 390 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom N475 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Sempron LE-1150's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron LE-1150 — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Sempron LE-1150. The Atom N475 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Sempron LE-1150 uses Sparta (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N475 scores 405 against the Sempron LE-1150's 390 — a 3.8% lead for the Atom N475. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom N475	Sempron LE-1150
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz	2 GHz+9%
Base Clock	1.83 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	Sparta (2007)
PassMark	405+4%	390

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N475 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron LE-1150 uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.