Atom N475 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

Atom N475 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ Performance Spectrum

Atom N475

1 / 2

405

0.0%

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

1 / 1

420

+3.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom N475 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom N475 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom N475

2010

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 420).
❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

2004

Why buy it

✅+3.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N475 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom N475 better than Mobile Athlon 64 2800+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom N475 is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ pulls ahead with 3.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom N475 is the better buy right now. Atom N475 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $75 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3.7% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom N475 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom N475 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom N475

The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom N475 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 versus 1.8 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ — a 1.7% clock advantage for the Atom N475. The Atom N475 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses Oakville (2003−2004). In PassMark, the Atom N475 scores 405 against the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+'s 420 — a 3.6% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+.

Feature	Atom N475	Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz+2%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.83 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K
Process	45 nm	—
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	Oakville (2003−2004)
PassMark	405	420+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N475 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-667 on the Atom N475 versus 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ — the Atom N475 supports 66.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 2 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N475) and 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+).

Feature	Atom N475	Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Socket	FCBGA559	754
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-667+67%	400
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom N475) / false (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+). The Atom N475 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ rivals Pentium M 725.