Athlon 64 2800+ vs Atom N475

Athlon 64 2800+ vs Atom N475 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 2800+

1 / 1

420

+3.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom N475

1 / 2

405

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 2800+ vs Atom N475 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 2800+ vs Atom N475: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 2800+

2004

Why buy it

✅+3.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 89W instead of 512W, a 423W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 5.4 PassMark/$ ($178 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N475 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Atom N475

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $103 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $178 MSRP).
✅Delivers 128.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 2.4 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $178 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Athlon 64 2800+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 420).
❌475.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 89W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom N475 better than Athlon 64 2800+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom N475 is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 2800+ pulls ahead with 3.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 2800+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom N475 is the better buy right now. Atom N475 comes in $103 cheaper on MSRP at $75 MSRP versus $178 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Athlon 64 2800+ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3.7% better PassMark. It is also 128.9% better value on MSRP (5.4 vs 2.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom N475 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 2800+ vs Atom N475 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 2800+

The Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Abril 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $100.

Atom N475

The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 2800+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom N475's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 2800+ versus 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 — a 1.7% clock advantage for the Atom N475. The Athlon 64 2800+ uses the NewCastle (2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Atom N475 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 2800+ scores 420 against the Atom N475's 405 — a 3.6% lead for the Athlon 64 2800+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 2800+	Atom N475
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	1.83 GHz+2%
Base Clock	—	1.83 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512K (per core)
Process	130 nm	45 nm-65%
Architecture	NewCastle (2004)	Pineview (2009−2011)
PassMark	420+4%	405

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 2800+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom N475 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 2800+ versus DDR3-667 on the Atom N475 — the Atom N475 supports -266.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 2800+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 754 (Athlon 64 2800+) and Intel NM10 (Atom N475).

Feature	Athlon 64 2800+	Atom N475
Socket	754	FCBGA559
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR-400	DDR3-667
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom N475 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Athlon 64 2800+ requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Athlon 64 2800+	Atom N475
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel GMA 3150

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 2800+ was priced at $178, while the Atom N475 came in at $75. On launch pricing ($178 vs $75), Atom N475 was $103 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 2800+ delivers 2.4 pts/$ vs 5.4 pts/$ for the Atom N475 — making the Atom N475 the 78.4% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 2800+	Atom N475
MSRP	$178	$75-58%
Performance per Dollar	2.4	5.4+125%
Release Date	2004	2010

Search Athlon 64 2800+ on Amazon

Search Atom N475 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.