Athlon 64 2800+
Opteron 140
Athlon 64 2800+ vs Opteron 140 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 2800+ vs Opteron 140 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 64 2800+ vs Opteron 140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 2800+
2004Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 140 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (420 vs 428).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $178 MSRP, while Opteron 140 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Opteron 140
2003Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 89W, a 4W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 140 better than Athlon 64 2800+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 2800+ vs Opteron 140 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon 64 2800+
The Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Abril 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $100.
Opteron 140
The Opteron 140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Setembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 428 points. Launch price was $596.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 2800+ and Opteron 140 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 2800+ versus 1.4 GHz on the Opteron 140 — a 25% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 2800+. The Athlon 64 2800+ uses the NewCastle (2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Opteron 140 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 2800+ scores 420 against the Opteron 140's 428 — a 1.9% lead for the Opteron 140. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 2800+ | Opteron 140 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz+29% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | NewCastle (2004) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| PassMark | 420 | 428+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 2800+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Opteron 140 uses 940 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 2800+ | Opteron 140 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | 940 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 2800+ and Opteron 140
