Athlon 64 2800+ vs Celeron D 352

Athlon 64 2800+ vs Celeron D 352 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 2800+

1 / 1

420

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron D 352

1 / 1

418

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 2800+ vs Celeron D 352 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 2800+ vs Celeron D 352: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 2800+

2004

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($178 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron D 352.

Celeron D 352

2006

Why buy it

✅Costs $109 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $178 MSRP).
✅Delivers 156.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 2.4 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $178 MSRP).
✅Draws 84W instead of 89W, a 5W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Athlon 64 2800+.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (418 vs 420).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron D 352 better than Athlon 64 2800+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron D 352 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 2800+ pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 2800+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron D 352 is the better buy right now. Celeron D 352 comes in $109 cheaper on MSRP at $69 MSRP versus $178 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Athlon 64 2800+ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 156.7% better value on MSRP (6.1 vs 2.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron D 352 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 2800+ vs Celeron D 352 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 2800+

The Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Abril 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $100.

Celeron D 352

The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 2800+ and Celeron D 352 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 2800+ versus 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 — a 56% clock advantage for the Celeron D 352. The Athlon 64 2800+ uses the NewCastle (2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron D 352 uses Cedar Mill (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 2800+ scores 420 against the Celeron D 352's 418 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon 64 2800+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 2800+	Celeron D 352
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	3.2 GHz+78%
Base Clock	—	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	130 nm	65 nm-50%
Architecture	NewCastle (2004)	Cedar Mill (2006)
PassMark	420	418
Geekbench 6 Single	—	180

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 2800+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron D 352 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 2800+ versus 800 on the Celeron D 352 — the Celeron D 352 supports -300% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon 64 2800+) vs 2 (Celeron D 352). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 754 (Athlon 64 2800+) and 865G,915,945,965,G31,G41 (Celeron D 352).

Feature	Athlon 64 2800+	Celeron D 352
Socket	754	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR-400	800
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 2800+) / false (Celeron D 352). Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

Feature	Athlon 64 2800+	Celeron D 352
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	false
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 2800+ was priced at $178, while the Celeron D 352 came in at $69. On launch pricing ($178 vs $69), Celeron D 352 was $109 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 2800+ delivers 2.4 pts/$ vs 6.1 pts/$ for the Celeron D 352 — making the Celeron D 352 the 87.9% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 2800+	Celeron D 352
MSRP	$178	$69-61%
Performance per Dollar	2.4	6.1+154%
Release Date	2004	2006

Search Athlon 64 2800+ on Amazon

Search Celeron D 352 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.