Athlon 64 2800+
VS
GX-210JA

Athlon 64 2800+ vs GX-210JA

AMD

Athlon 64 2800+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2004
VS
AMD

GX-210JA

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 2800+ is positioned at rank 1098 and the GX-210JA is on rank 1119, so the Athlon 64 2800+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 2800+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
132083%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
124805%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
90619%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
27300%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
21624%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
18917%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
10835%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
10693%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
9736%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
9736%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
9627%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
9367%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
9236%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
9199%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
9115%
#1098
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
100%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
97%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
95%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
92%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
89%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
83%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
81%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
79%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
78%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
76%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
71%
#1109
Athlon XP 2400+
MSRP: $193|Avg: $10
67%
#1110
Pentium D 950
MSRP: $637|Avg: $10
62%
#1111
Athlon XP 1500+
MSRP: $130|Avg: $15
61%
#1112
Athlon 64 4000+
MSRP: $482|Avg: $30
59%
#1113
Pentium 4 2.66
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
53%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar GX-210JA

#1107
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3452%
#1108
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3401%
#1109
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3122%
#1110
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3108%
#1111
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3080%
#1113
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2974%
#1114
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2852%
#1115
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2847%
#1116
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2771%
#1119
GX-210JA
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1120
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
97%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
97%
#1127
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
97%
#1128
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
97%
#1129
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
97%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
96%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
96%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The GX-210JA (2013) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon 64 2800+GX-210JA
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (NewCastle (2004) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 2800+ (2004) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon 64 2800+GX-210JA
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 2800+ and GX-210JA

AMD

Athlon 64 2800+

The Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Abril 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $100.

AMD

GX-210JA

The GX-210JA is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 2800+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the GX-210JA offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the GX-210JA has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 2800+ versus 1 GHz on the GX-210JA — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 2800+. The Athlon 64 2800+ uses the NewCastle (2004) architecture (130 nm), while the GX-210JA uses Temash (2013) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 2800+ scores 420 against the GX-210JA's 425 — a 1.2% lead for the GX-210JA.

FeatureAthlon 64 2800+GX-210JA
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz+80%
1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB+100%
Process
130 nm
28 nm-78%
Architecture
NewCastle (2004)
Temash (2013)
PassMark
420
425+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 2800+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the GX-210JA uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 2800+GX-210JA
Socket
754
FT3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0