Atom N475 vs Sempron 3300+

Atom N475 vs Sempron 3300+ Performance Spectrum

Atom N475

1 / 2

405

0.0%

412

+1.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom N475 vs Sempron 3300+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom N475 vs Sempron 3300+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom N475

2010

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Sempron 3300+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 412).
❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while Sempron 3300+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌725.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 62W.

Sempron 3300+

2001

Why buy it

✅Draws 62W instead of 512W, a 450W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N475 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron 3300+ better than Atom N475?

Yes. Sempron 3300+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Sempron 3300+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3300+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron 3300+ is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Sempron 3300+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $75 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Atom N475 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.2% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom N475 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2001). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom N475 vs Sempron 3300+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom N475

The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.

Sempron 3300+

The Sempron 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 412 points. Launch price was $30.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom N475 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Sempron 3300+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3300+ — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Sempron 3300+. The Atom N475 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Sempron 3300+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N475 scores 405 against the Sempron 3300+'s 412 — a 1.7% lead for the Sempron 3300+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom N475	Sempron 3300+
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz	2 GHz+9%
Base Clock	1.83 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K
Process	45 nm-65%	130 nm
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark	405	412+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N475 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 3300+ uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.