Atom N475
VS
GX-210JA

Atom N475 vs GX-210JA

Intel

Atom N475

1 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2010
VS
AMD

GX-210JA

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N475 is positioned at rank 193 and the GX-210JA is on rank 1119, so the Atom N475 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom N475

#179
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
362%
#180
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
357%
#181
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
328%
#182
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
326%
#183
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
323%
#185
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
312%
#186
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
299%
#187
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
299%
#188
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
291%
#192
Pentium Gold 4417U
MSRP: $161|Avg: N/A
100%
#193
Atom N475
MSRP: $75|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar GX-210JA

#1107
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3452%
#1108
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3401%
#1109
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3122%
#1110
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3108%
#1111
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3080%
#1113
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2974%
#1114
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2852%
#1115
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2847%
#1116
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2771%
#1119
GX-210JA
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1120
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
97%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
97%
#1127
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
97%
#1128
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
97%
#1129
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
97%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
96%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
96%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Atom N475 leads in gaming performance. However, the GX-210JA is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 4.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAtom N475GX-210JA
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($75)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom N475GX-210JA
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($75)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom N475 and GX-210JA

Intel

Atom N475

The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.

AMD

GX-210JA

The GX-210JA is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Atom N475 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the GX-210JA offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the GX-210JA has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 versus 1 GHz on the GX-210JA — a 58.7% clock advantage for the Atom N475. The Atom N475 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the GX-210JA uses Temash (2013) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N475 scores 405 against the GX-210JA's 425 — a 4.8% lead for the GX-210JA.

FeatureAtom N475GX-210JA
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.83 GHz+83%
1 GHz
Base Clock
1.83 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1 MB+100%
Process
45 nm
28 nm-38%
Architecture
Pineview (2009−2011)
Temash (2013)
PassMark
405
425+5%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N475 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the GX-210JA uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom N475GX-210JA
Socket
FCBGA559
FT3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-667
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom N475 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the GX-210JA requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom N475GX-210JA
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3150