Atom N475 vs Pentium 4 2.80

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom N475 vs Pentium 4 2.80 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom N475 vs Pentium 4 2.80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom N475

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $252 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $327 MSRP).
✅Delivers 332.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 1.2 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $327 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Pentium 4 2.80 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 408).
❌365.5% higher power demand at 512W vs 110W.

Pentium 4 2.80

2002

Why buy it

✅Draws 110W instead of 512W, a 402W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 5.4 PassMark/$ ($327 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N475 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 4 2.80 better than Atom N475?

Yes. Pentium 4 2.80 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium 4 2.80 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 4 2.80 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium 4 2.80 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Pentium 4 2.80 comes in 336.0% more expensive on MSRP at $327 MSRP versus $75 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Atom N475 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom N475 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2002). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom N475 vs Pentium 4 2.80 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom N475

The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.

Pentium 4 2.80

The Pentium 4 2.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.79 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom N475 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Pentium 4 2.80's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 versus 2.79 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.80 — a 41.6% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 2.80. The Atom N475 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium 4 2.80 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N475 scores 405 against the Pentium 4 2.80's 408 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium 4 2.80. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom N475	Pentium 4 2.80
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz	2.79 GHz+52%
Base Clock	1.83 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	45 nm-65%	130 nm
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	405	408

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N475 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 4 2.80 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom N475	Pentium 4 2.80
Socket	FCBGA559	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-667	—
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom N475 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Pentium 4 2.80 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Atom N475	Pentium 4 2.80
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel GMA 3150	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Atom N475 was priced at $75, while the Pentium 4 2.80 came in at $327. On launch pricing ($75 vs $327), Atom N475 was $252 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom N475 delivers 5.4 pts/$ vs 1.2 pts/$ for the Pentium 4 2.80 — making the Atom N475 the 124.9% better value option.

Feature	Atom N475	Pentium 4 2.80
MSRP	$75-77%	$327
Performance per Dollar	5.4+350%	1.2
Release Date	2010	2002

Search Atom N475 on Amazon

Search Pentium 4 2.80 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.