Atom N475 vs Celeron D 352

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom N475 vs Celeron D 352 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom N475 vs Celeron D 352: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom N475

2010

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Celeron D 352 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 418).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
❌509.5% higher power demand at 512W vs 84W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron D 352.

Celeron D 352

2006

Why buy it

✅Costs $6 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
✅Delivers 12.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 5.4 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
✅Draws 84W instead of 512W, a 428W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Atom N475.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N475 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron D 352 better than Atom N475?

Yes. Celeron D 352 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 3.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron D 352 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron D 352 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron D 352 is the better buy right now. Celeron D 352 comes in $6 cheaper on MSRP at $69 MSRP versus $75 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 12.2% better value on MSRP (6.1 vs 5.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom N475 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom N475 vs Celeron D 352 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom N475

The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.

Celeron D 352

The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom N475 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Celeron D 352's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 versus 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Celeron D 352 (base: 1.83 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Atom N475 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron D 352 uses Cedar Mill (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N475 scores 405 against the Celeron D 352's 418 — a 3.2% lead for the Celeron D 352. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom N475	Celeron D 352
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz	3.2 GHz+75%
Base Clock	1.83 GHz	3.2 GHz+75%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	Cedar Mill (2006)
PassMark	405	418+3%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	180

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N475 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron D 352 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-667 on the Atom N475 versus 800 on the Celeron D 352 — the Celeron D 352 supports 19.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron D 352 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom N475) vs 2 (Celeron D 352). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N475) and 865G,915,945,965,G31,G41 (Celeron D 352).

Feature	Atom N475	Celeron D 352
Socket	FCBGA559	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-667	800+20%
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom N475) / false (Celeron D 352). The Atom N475 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Celeron D 352 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

Feature	Atom N475	Celeron D 352
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel GMA 3150	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	false
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Atom N475 was priced at $75, while the Celeron D 352 came in at $69. On launch pricing ($75 vs $69), Celeron D 352 was $6 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom N475 delivers 5.4 pts/$ vs 6.1 pts/$ for the Celeron D 352 — making the Celeron D 352 the 11.5% better value option.

Feature	Atom N475	Celeron D 352
MSRP	$75	$69-8%
Performance per Dollar	5.4	6.1+13%
Release Date	2010	2006

Search Atom N475 on Amazon

Search Celeron D 352 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.